Endicott25
Joined: 11 Jun 2008
Posts: 1
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:20 am Post subject: Amendment of a Law |
 |
|
| It is all conditional to the situation as when the judge may deny bail. The judge is the authoritative power behind these types of situations. It is the judge who must determine at a hearing held on the issue of setting or reinstating bail. It is in concern of the situation that the person violated a condition of release related to the safety of a victim. This is what related to the stature of the alleged offense or the safety of the community. Just like any other proposal this amendment proposal too faced lots of controversies. The element theta makes it different is the amount of concern that it is facing. The current law seems not that satisfactory for the present trend of Texas. This is the reason that the new proposal came into being. An advocate David Disiere, commented on the issue as ‘something that will change the entire outlook of making crime or letting it happen’. The new proposal has been forwarded with the idea of modifying the former rule related to the same concern. The current law followed the rule that if a person who is released on bail pending trial gets caught of performing any crime or has been accused of a felony may violate the conditions of release and subsequently have bail reinstated. This is not justifiable for many there were lots of controversies and oppositions related to this relaxation. As a result the new proposal came up in the scene. The proposed amendment would ensure a different modified sequence for the same consequence. It is meant for the functionality that if the person violates a condition of release related to the safety of a victim or the community, the person may be denied bail and precluded from the opportunity to commit additional acts. |
|
